Welcome to the StolenSidekick Page:
This original updates page has
been replaced with this abridged version.
If you want to see the original, the link is located below. Be forewarned, I have been told it
sometimes takes up to 3 hours to read the entire thing (since most of my views
come from people at work, I am afraid to think of all the hours corporations
have lost because of this site).
The back story:
On May 31st, my friend Ivanna left her T-Mobile
Sidekick II in a taxi cab in
As soon as she realized that she
had left it in the taxi, she contacted me and asked me to try and contact who
ever found the phone. She couldn’t
do it herself as she was getting her dress fitted that day. I proceeded to call the
phone. I also sent text messages
and emails to the Sidekick with the subject and body “--==REWARD IF
FOUND==--“. After 1-2 days of
constant attempts of contacting the person(s) who found the phone, we gave up
and decided to buy a new one.
Unfortunately,
When she activated her new
Sidekick, Ivanna realized that the person who found the phone had been using
it. Not only had the person emailed
Ivanna’s private pictures to herself and friends, but she had also taken pics of
herself, family and friends, used the phone, sent emails of the pics she had
taken, and signed on to AOL. We
could see all this because the Sidekick works differently than most phones. While on a average phone any activity
and content stays on the actual phone, on the Sidekick EVERYTHING gets
automatically uploaded to T-Mobile servers which is accessible on the
internet. That means any pictures
you take, and emails you send/receive, any notes you take, etc can be access
from the internet. When you replace
the phone, T-Mobile downloads all the content to the new Sidekick from the old
Sidekick. We hadn’t seen the
content that the person had put on the found phone as Ivanna had not ever signed
up for the T-Mobile web access.
Once the phone was lost, it was too late to register as T-Mobile sends
your sign in info to the phone, creating a catch 22 if you don’t have the phone
on you.
One thing we immediately noticed
was that the person who had found the phone had deleted all the reward text
messages and emails. On top of
that, the person had started using the Sidekick sending herself emails 2-3 hours
after my friend had left it in the taxi.
So, all in all, we could determine that this person had purposely ignored
the requests of the rightful owner.
Ivanna gave me the person’s AOL screen name and I waited for them to sign
on. Since the email address and the
AOL name matched, I knew that her name was Sasha.
When she signed on, I sent her an
instant message informing her that she had our phone and requested it back. I was rebuffed with cursing, racist
comments, and illiterate sentences.
She claimed that her friend found the phone and that she was keeping
it. I asked if it was the
overweight person in the pictures we had obtained from the phone. He then got on the IM and started again
with the racist comments as well as violence. He told me to come to an address in
Corona Queens because he “got ball” and he’d give me the Sidekick so he could
hit me “wit it”. I informed them
that I had all their pics, their email/screen name and would post this
online. They informed me that they
had the “white little biyotch” info who owned the phone and
would post that online too.
I informed
my friend of this conversation and was upset as me about this. We couldn’t understand how someone would
not return something that doesn’t belong to them. I have lived in
The online story:
On June 6th, I posted
the story of what happened as well as Sasha’s email address and the pics she had
taken of her mother, the overweight friend, and herself. I decided not to post the picture of a
baby and her little brother. All
this info went on a page in the
subdirectory of my personal website. My website previously had only been
visited by my friends never receiving more than 1,000 hits a month. I then posted the link to the “Stolen
Sidekick Page” on a forum I was a member of, as well as IM’d it to a couple of
friends. After a couple hours I
started receiving a large amount of email to a new address I had created just
for this story. One of them had
Sasha’s Myspace account address. I
then posted the page on Digg.com.
Soon, it went to the front page of Digg, becoming the highest “dugg”
story for the week. By the time I
went to sleep that night, the page had received almost 50,000 unique visits.
By June 7th, it had
gotten 500,000. I received more and
more emails from visitors including an NYPD officer who told me I should go to
the police to have them handle this matter. I then received an email from Sasha’s
brother who informed me that his sister had bought the phone from a taxi driver,
that she would not return this phone, and that he was military police and I
would have to deal with him if I didn’t take down the page. When I posted this info, I received
emails from people in the military as well as veterans who were shocked at this
kind of behavior from a fellow serviceman.
People discovered his name, Luis, and his Myspace page as well as the
overweight fellow’s name, Gordo, and his Myspace page as well.
By the next day, I was getting
millions of visitors. There were
hundreds of thousands of website pointing to mine according to Google. I was also getting 3,000 emails a
day. This kind of response was
amazing. People who lived in
Also in the emails was multiple
request from news outlets such as radio, newspaper, and TV. Most of the interviews were on the
phone, with some news outlets (such as the New York Times) saying that they
would need to confirm the story before printing. I looked forward to this as I had
started receiving emails from viewers who felt that this page was either a false
story or that I was a viral ad for T-Mobile.
By June 9th, I was
receiving millions upon millions of hits.
The brother had emailed me again repeating his story that his sister had
bought the phone from a taxi driver and would not return it because then she
would be out the money. I returned
the email saying that this story made no sense as she had already said she got
the phone from her friend, as well as the fact that we had offered her a reward
and would have happily replaced any money she had spent. Besides this, the legal tenet of “Caveat
Emptor” comes into play. It
translates into “Let the buyer beware”.
Basically this means that no matter how you buy an item, you are legally
responsible for the authenticity for the purchase. Sasha had also responded to the
attention by stating on her Myspace page that she didn’t have the phone.
I decided to bring up a forum so
I could try and answer questions in a larger scale, rather than just answer 1 by
1 as I was in the emails. I had
received multiple offers of forums to use, so I picked one with good
resources. As soon as I put up the
link, I checked the stats of the forum.
After 30 seconds we had over 100 visitors. By 1 minute, we had 300 visitors and 10
members. By 5 minutes, we had 10
posts, over 100 members, and over a 1,000 visitors. After that, the server crashed from the
usage. By this time I was on the front page of 400,000 websites, had been
“Slashdotted”, and was at almost 4,000 emails a day. I had emails from all over the
world. Even a band had written a
song about the incident. I tried to
put up another board on Google Groups, and after an hour, had Google put a
restriction on posts due to over usage.
After multiple disastrous attempts at putting up a forum (including
bringing down an ISP from traffic), we were at last successful.
I started noticing as much as
there were positive feedback on what I was doing, there was also a lot of
negative comments from nay sayers declaring that the site was false. Also, that I was either doing the wrong
thing, had the wrong girl, or remarked about her age. I responded decaring the authenticity of
the page, that I had enough facts to know I had the right girl, and that
regardless of her age, she should know better than to keep someone else’s
property, as well as the adults around her helping her keep the ill gotten
Sidekick. I had put up a
paragraph on the website pleading wirh her and her family to do the right thing
and return the Sidekick. I promised
to take down the website if it was returned. I never received a response to this,
We finally went to the police
station and asked to submit a stolen property report. Without our knowledge, the officer only
filled out a lost item report. The
difference is that no actions would be done with this report. A lost item report is mostly for
insurance claims (which we didn’t have).
After numerous failed attempts to contact the police station, I was
finally able to get the report number.
When I posted this info online, I was informed of the mistake by a
anonymous NYPD officer who had read my site. We met up and he gave me the correct
paperwork to fill out and told me that he and his fellow officers agreed with
the situation. So we had to arrange
to go again to the police station.
In the mean time, the traffic to
my website was insane. I was
uploading upwords of 200 GB a day.
This from a page that was about 100 KB. I was bleeding money from the page. I had promised from the beginning that
this site was not an attempt to make money, but to do what was morally
right. In this regard, I had not
put up any ads or paid links. I had
been offered thousands of dollars to put up as little as one link on the
site. If I had put up an ad, I
would have made even more from the millions of hits I was getting. All this was
not something I could live with.
But after losing money from the bandwidth, I decided to put up a Paypal
donation link asking only people who could afford it to donate if they wished to
help out. Within a couple hours, I
received about $1,000. Due to some
of the negative emails I took down the link. As well as receiving enough at the time
to cover this bandwidth expense, I wanted to try and remain favorable in the
general publics views. Still,
though, I was blasted as a fake money making site. The fact that I had no proof that the
police were doing anything was enough to confirm these people’s views.
After a couple days, my friend
and I returned to the police station.
We were told to leave with the “tails between our legs”. When we refused, I was detained for
having the paperwork the anonymous officer had supplied me with. After much arguing, I was told that the
law of “finder’s keepers, losers weeper’s” was in effect. We were allowed to leave, and I posted
this info online. My readers
immediately started a campaign to convince the NYPD to do what was right.
Gordo then emailed me saying that
Sasha’s mother had bought the phone on the subway for $100, and would return it
to me for that amount. This made
even less sense. First they kept
changing their story on how they got it.
This version was great. I
mean, who buys a phone from a stanger on the subway for $100? The time of a reward was over. It would have been for doing the right
thing. Holding the phone for ransom
was not going to happen. I was then
contacted by a few sources that the family was proceeding with a harassment
lawsuit against me. This seemed far
fetched as I had not been contacted with a cease and desist letter as well as
all the info I had posted being in the public domain. I was contacted by numerous lawyers
stating that I was in the clear.
Still, there was an alleged law firm trying to make a name for themselves
by posting in my forum that I was in the wrong. All this made for some sleepless
nights.
Meanwhile Ivanna’s wedding was
getting closer and closer and since she had not been able to contact the embassy
in time, her sister’s visa was denied.
I tried a last minute gamble and requested that from readers who wanted
to help, to please email the embassy for us. This resulted in me being cc’d in
hundreds of emails to the embassy with people requesting that the sister be
allowed in the country.
Unfortunately, even though we were in contact with 2 members of Congress
who had viewed the site, it was too late for the visa to be made.
The police finally contacted
Ivanna after all the public attention and the pressure from the New York
Times. They refused to talk to me,
so she supplied them with all the information about Sasha we had gathered. A couple days later, I was awoken to
people calling me saying that my picture and story was on the front page of the
Metro Section of the New York Times as well as being on the radio news reports
around the world. On top of that,
it made multiple TV nightly news reports as well as on MSNBC. It turned out that over the
weekend, the police had arrested Sasha and gotten the Sidekick back for us.
As Ivanna had already bought a
new Sidekick, there was no need for an additional one. We decided to sell the Sidekick on
Ebay. 1/3 of the total to her, 1/3
to me, and 1/3 to a charity for helping single mothers and children. I also contacted T-Mobile and they
generously offered to donate the total amount of the winning bid, up to
$5,000. I would cover the taxes as
well as the cost of the auction out of my own percentage. I had never sold anything on Ebay, and
put up a auction for the Sidekick, without the proper paperwork for the
charity. After over 10,000 views in
less than a day and over $1,000 bid, Ebay removed the auction because of the
lacking paperwork. About a day
later, I reposted a new auction with all the correct paperwork. This time, the response was a bit
slower. After 7 days though, there
were over 40,000 views and the winning bid came out to $3,600.
Unfortunately, the winning bidder
turned out to be fake. This is
particularly in poor taste as for costing the charity needed money. Any attempts to contact the remaining
bidders with “second chance offers” was blocked by Ebay because my account was
new. They also blocked numerous
viewers from my site from contacting them.
This was particularly puzzling as multiple
spammers were successful in contacting the bidders offering them fake Sidekicks
allegedly from my site, as well as fake “second chance offers”.
What is happening now:
Update #70 July 30, 2006 3:00 p.m. I have attempted to send the
second chance offer to multiple lower bidders, but as they are never informed
via email, they see the auction on their “My Ebay” page too late to
respond. As the “15 minutes” of
attention this site has received is over, I will not post another auction. I am still offering the Sidekick up for
sale privately. Contact me at the
email address below if interested.
I will honor the same percentage to Ivanna and the charity as promised in
the auction.
I have no further news at the
moment on what is Sasha’s status.
Ivanna is in
As for what I am planning to do
with this website, I have decided to leave this page up. I will also leave a link below to the
original page. I have blacked out
Sasha and the other pics, as I feel that justice has been served. I hope
that she has learned to do the right thing from now on if not for her sake, then
her baby’s sake as well.
Update #71 January 10th, 2007 11:00
a.m. Wow... It's been a long time since my last
update. Yet, I still am getting 20-50 mails STILL a day from people
asking me for updates, what I’ve done with the Sidekick, what's happened
to Sasha, what am I doing now... Well...
My friend Ivanna is happily married. We recently filmed a segment
on 20/20 about the whole internet experience. It should air Feb.
9th. (I will keep you updated). We have no idea what happened to
Sasha... We never pressed charges. We were satisfied getting the
Sidekick back and felt that enough attention had been brought to her, and
hopefully she has learned her lesson. And the Sidekick.... We gave up on the Ebay auction (I will
never use Ebay again) and offered it directly over this site. In the end, we raised over $2.000 for
charity. I will post a copy of the paperwork when I get it. And no,
we didn't take any percentage off for ourselves.
As for me.. Will I
ever do something like this?? HELL NO! This took up way too much of
my time, too many expenses, too much harassment. I have been hired by a
sapphire company... http://www.TheNaturalSapphireCompany.com doing SEO and
PR work fulltime. I do things like sending out press
releases... such as us obtaining the
Update #72 February 9th, 2007 3:00
p.m. BIG NEWS. So, tonight ABC will air Ivanna
and my interview on 20/20 (the show starts at 9
p.m.). I'm very excited and hope you can view
it. As for those finding out about this site for the first time...
Where have you been????
On another note, I finally got the
paperwork from the charity. I again want to thank the private donor
and T-Mobile for being so generous. http://www.EvanWasHere.com/StolenSidekick/Charity.pdf
.
Links:
(IRC)
irc://irc.freenode.net/sidekick (IRC)
Original Page
http://www.evanwashere.com/stolensidekick/original/ Original Page
My Email Stolensidekick@gmail.com My
email
Some Media Attention and other PDF’s:
http://www.evanwashere.com/stolensidekick/NYTimes2.pdf
International Herald Tribune:
http://www.evanwashere.com/stolensidekick/International_Herald_Tribune.pdf
The Times:
http://www.evanwashere.com/stolensidekick/The_Times.pdf
The
http://www.evanwashere.com/stolensidekick/New_York_Press.pdf
The
http://www.evanwashere.com/stolensidekick/The_Seattle_Times.pdf
The
http://www.evanwashere.com/stolensidekick/TampaBayTimes.pdf
The MSNBC Video:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/default.cdnx/id/13508645/displaymode/1157
The 1010 Wins Radio story:
http://www.evanwashere.com/stolensidekick/1010wins-sidekick.mp3
Wikipedia: (note: Wikipedia admins have recently taken down the
page my readers have put up stating it wasn’t news worthy. This is while they do keep up the “dog
poop girl” from
http://www.evanwashere.com/stolensidekick/Wikipedia.pdf
The 2nd Ebay auction:
http://www.evanwashere.com/stolensidekick/ebay.pdf
Donation Button: